He worked in a climate which offered bi-partisan work; and no Democratic Tea-types. That guy was
so extreme he would have adored the Tea Party!
Why did he so loudly, vociferously, and overtly attack all black people on welfare?
Why did he want students shot when they protested at California colleges during his gubernatorial
stay in that state?
Why did he have to go all the way to Germany to honor fallen WWII German soldiers?
He couldn't have sent an email, a note, at least something quieter than an international trip, if he felt he must honor those soldiers?
Why did he believe he didn't have to follow the law of The Boland Amendment, which was explicit?
After breaking that law, why did he find it necessary to sell weapons to both Iran and Iraq during the
war between those two countries?
Why did he feel he had to ignore those who told him the way he prosecuted 'Star Wars' was going to
spread deadly weapons to every terrorist group in the world?
Why didn't he listen to those who explained to him how deadly 'leveraged buy-outs' would be to
ordinary American middle-classed savings over time unless they were properly regulated?
Though he was once president of the actors' union in Hollywood, he did all he could to crush as many
important unions as he could when he became U.S. President.
This person was a nightmare of a president. He did, however, do his due diligence as a wildly
suppressive backlash guy. He ran on promising to offer backlash policies to American achievements
during the seventies, and he delivered in spades.
If he'd had the leverage the "teas" have wielded during America's post 2010 politics, he'd have been a
slashing kid in a candy store until the middle class was whittled down to the nothingness he wanted
Judge Robert Bork to whittle civil rights legislation to, in perpetuity,
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your post will be published after the author has reviewed.