Apple improves its products every other year or so.
Technology in America is vast and it updates at lightning speeds.
The government would cooperate with him if he wanted more 'crime' resources.
What would the middle of the country do without New York? Wither.
The East coast, West coast. and auto industry pay nearly all the taxes in the U.S.
Where is Wall Street? Where is Hollywood? Where is Ford, General Motors, Chrysler?
These places fund nearly everything in between.
Our government knows that.
New York doesn't need to reduce itself to the lowest common denominator it wants to
embrace in order to preside over safety.
I feel sure they aren't looking for guns.
They are looking for terrorists.
Jihadists have a habit of training people who will be "invisible men" in America to do their
dirty work. But-
New York can get help doing technologically savvy searches without terrorizing an entire people.
Bloomberg does his evil because he can, not because he must.
Police departments know exactly who is committing crime in cities. They are not as mystified
as TV detectives at crime scenes. Specific identifiable groups and individuals commit most of
the crime in all our big cities. The police know exactly who they are, how to locate them, and
who is getting added to their ranks.
The New York mayor simply doesn't think it's a big deal to disrespect the black community.
He gets away with it, so why not continue?
NYPD cops have been gunning down young black men so long now, they wonder what all the
fuss is about with simple assaults on dignity.
Are we actually supposed to listen to that cliched paternalistic mound: "This hurts me more than
it hurts you. I'm doing this for your own good."
What a load. Unbelievable.
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Monday, August 12, 2013
Tell It To Trayvon
Bloomberg claims his stop and frisk policies mean people can walk down the streets without having
to look over their shoulders. Really? Some freak won't call to report your 'look' to the police, then
gun you down as they approach?
Some badge won't start handling you on the pretense you need to be disarmed?
You ARE kidding, right Mr. Mayor?
Do you know how jealous The Klan is of you New York gangs in blue?
They would love to do what you do all day long. If they knew all they had to do was change colors
from white hoods to blue shirts, they would have done it. When they killed Emmett Till they ran and they hid. They denied it.
Byron De La Beckwith, as well, denied all.
Bloomberg- he is proud of his malfeasance. Former New York Mayors and Governors are proud of it. Current New York politicians are proud of it.
We can't really be surprised. Things may have always been this way in New York, without such
increasing media scrutiny.
At one time nearly every average New York family owned slaves. Slavery did not stay in the south,
and The New York Times was a beacon of a foul rag when it came to slaves and slavery in America.
I imagine that is why they were so tickled at the opportunity to use the term "refugees" during our
Katrina crises in this country. If we weren't here as valued lifestock, what are we doing here? We must be refugees if FEMA was duty-bound to respond to us, right? How else were they to think
of us? Sadly, we built this country and have nowhere else to go.
Maybe the average modern New Yorker has a hard time leaving vestiges of their "privileged" legacy behind.
to look over their shoulders. Really? Some freak won't call to report your 'look' to the police, then
gun you down as they approach?
Some badge won't start handling you on the pretense you need to be disarmed?
You ARE kidding, right Mr. Mayor?
Do you know how jealous The Klan is of you New York gangs in blue?
They would love to do what you do all day long. If they knew all they had to do was change colors
from white hoods to blue shirts, they would have done it. When they killed Emmett Till they ran and they hid. They denied it.
Byron De La Beckwith, as well, denied all.
Bloomberg- he is proud of his malfeasance. Former New York Mayors and Governors are proud of it. Current New York politicians are proud of it.
We can't really be surprised. Things may have always been this way in New York, without such
increasing media scrutiny.
At one time nearly every average New York family owned slaves. Slavery did not stay in the south,
and The New York Times was a beacon of a foul rag when it came to slaves and slavery in America.
I imagine that is why they were so tickled at the opportunity to use the term "refugees" during our
Katrina crises in this country. If we weren't here as valued lifestock, what are we doing here? We must be refugees if FEMA was duty-bound to respond to us, right? How else were they to think
of us? Sadly, we built this country and have nowhere else to go.
Maybe the average modern New Yorker has a hard time leaving vestiges of their "privileged" legacy behind.
Saving Black and Hispanic Lives? What Guff!
Bloomberg my dear- try saving some white people now. We will applaud that. White people you stop and frisk are found with more contraband than black and Hispanic people you stop and frisk. Actually do the math you enjoy spouting to bolster your racist claptrap. Can you quantify?
Stop saving us, Bwanna. Today you talked about people pulling guns as though you were
Wayne LaPierre. I suppose you believe black and hispanic drug use bolsters more various types of
crime than white drug use, and I understand those statistics. However, once a person has the drug,
you decided to frisk for, whatever crime you could have prevented is already complete. If you aren't focusing on big suppliers, you are criminalizing Americans for no good reason.
Not shifting your resources is causing tremendously racist outcomes of destruction in the very
communities you purport to protect.
Grow up. The harm you do does matter.
Stop saving us, Bwanna. Today you talked about people pulling guns as though you were
Wayne LaPierre. I suppose you believe black and hispanic drug use bolsters more various types of
crime than white drug use, and I understand those statistics. However, once a person has the drug,
you decided to frisk for, whatever crime you could have prevented is already complete. If you aren't focusing on big suppliers, you are criminalizing Americans for no good reason.
Not shifting your resources is causing tremendously racist outcomes of destruction in the very
communities you purport to protect.
Grow up. The harm you do does matter.
Thank You Eric Holder!
We don't need minimum sentencing for most non-violent crimes unless massive harm is proven to have been done to others. Why are we incarcerating so many non-violent people?
These policies of relaxation could not have come at a better time for us in the Midwest.
In Michigan, we are building nothing right now except prisons! No. Violent crime is not increasing
here.
These policies of relaxation could not have come at a better time for us in the Midwest.
In Michigan, we are building nothing right now except prisons! No. Violent crime is not increasing
here.
NYC Crime Drop? Slop!
Crime has dropped in the country in general. Bloomberg claims he has to stop a group who prove
in practice to be 89% not guilty. The group is 80% Black and Latino.
He has to criminalize your minority sons to keep you safe.
Does he at the same time criminalize those who destroy your savings, your pensions, your college funds, your salary costs of living increases? Why should he? He is one of them.
NYC incidence of what Bloomberg likes to call crime may be down.
Incidences of what we in stop and frisk victimization communities call crime are not down at all. We
call 'stop and frisk' as it is practiced in our communities, criminal. We think of it as 'high crimes',
because we cannot afford it; yet we are the ones who pay for it. These practices financially burden
the black and Latino communities with nonsensical fines. But Bloomberg and Quinn are wonderful
cosmetic artists- so skilled at putting lipstick on pigs.
Didn't we find out again in the first decade of this century that New York needs to be healthy?
If it does get better, we all will.
in practice to be 89% not guilty. The group is 80% Black and Latino.
He has to criminalize your minority sons to keep you safe.
Does he at the same time criminalize those who destroy your savings, your pensions, your college funds, your salary costs of living increases? Why should he? He is one of them.
NYC incidence of what Bloomberg likes to call crime may be down.
Incidences of what we in stop and frisk victimization communities call crime are not down at all. We
call 'stop and frisk' as it is practiced in our communities, criminal. We think of it as 'high crimes',
because we cannot afford it; yet we are the ones who pay for it. These practices financially burden
the black and Latino communities with nonsensical fines. But Bloomberg and Quinn are wonderful
cosmetic artists- so skilled at putting lipstick on pigs.
Didn't we find out again in the first decade of this century that New York needs to be healthy?
If it does get better, we all will.
Fannie AND Freddie
POTUS isn't any longer enamored of these two.
Many liberals moan the only way for women and minorities to buy homes is with government
backed security.
I think what the President may be hinting is that for a while, people should be more cautious
about buying.
The first sub prime loans were targeted to made to African American female single heads of
household. That probably began in 2006 or so.
In the 70s, black families bought a great many homes.
At the turn of this century, those mortgages began to be free and clear.
Why should banks allow that to continue?
In some of those families deaths had occurred to allow transfer of property.
In other families divorces had occurred.
Many of those retiring women were those who fulfilled the female and black requirements companies
sought in the seventies so they could seem diverse moved to upscale retirement apartments and condos. Why should those properties stay in that family? Why should greed not want those properties
back from the black community?
Then, since it had begun to work in many cases, why not spread the disease to other working
communities?
See, when a black woman in her fifties or sixties loses her home, society thinks that's par for the course. No one bothers to see any of it as a worrisome trend. Our society would take quite a while to
even start a study of what had begun to happen.
The black community is a bell weather for the nation because banks target blacks unchallenged.
When they perfect their poison products here, of course then they go for the best meat in our herds.
I think POTUS knows how dangerous this is for the country as a whole, and would like to discourage
it in real estate.
The Latino population in the U.S. is encouraged to buy fifty, sixty, seventy year old homes. They are
not as inclined to do so as black families. A black person feels more secure living outside the
ownership of any kind of white or majority- even as regards the geography of real estate.
But here in Detroit, churches often invest in building and renting, providing housing for their faithful.
Maybe that is the better model. Banks are still owners, but not quite so intimately, and not of huge
difficult to regulate properties.
Although I know black families will always prefer ownership, I think younger ones would be willing
to work and save a little longer if rental properties were 'clean, well-lit places', as Ernest Hemingway
might say. We in this city would surely never want to go back to slum landlords. New York can't be
much different.
The thing is, I don't believe the bank ensnared as many black family properties as they had hoped to
acquire. Which is so odd, because with everyone out of work, what could have been the plan for so
many foreclosed homes?
The crisis was fomented when banks moved their machinations to so very many mainstream
middle-class hoods all at once.
I guess that can happen again, right? If people begin to buy in large numbers we could see the banks
attempting to repeat this folly. They were so desperate, they foreclosed on people who didn't even
have defaulted mortgages! They foreclosed on people serving in Iraq.
So properties large and small were attacked.
Next stop, pensions.
Detroit's pensions are 90% funded. Since people worked for them, why allow them to be raided?
Easy question to answer.
Detroit city proper is considered a third world. In a great many parts of the city, Detroit is third world. Some neighborhoods have been depressed for nearly thirty years. They are not developing,
or underdeveloped. They have been and are continuously depressed areas...almost no commerce whatsoever.
When Detroit pensions are attacked, as the city has been, people in the country as a whole will say
'par for the course', what would anyone expect?
Bad idea people.
If the housing crisis put your property underwater, think about your pensions being underwater?
Detroit citizens are having their public schools decimated, though they have never turned down a tax
millage.
Lansing is destroying us as much as they can as best they can.
What good is my pension going to be if all my neighbors who were once city workers begin to starve?
When they get a few of us because we love coded racism so very, very much- they wind up getting
a bunch of us.
Pay attention to the city of 750,000 citizens who number only about 20,000 white.
I was forced to read Ernest Hemingway in college. So let's go back to him. 'Don't ask for whom the
bell tolls...'
Many liberals moan the only way for women and minorities to buy homes is with government
backed security.
I think what the President may be hinting is that for a while, people should be more cautious
about buying.
The first sub prime loans were targeted to made to African American female single heads of
household. That probably began in 2006 or so.
In the 70s, black families bought a great many homes.
At the turn of this century, those mortgages began to be free and clear.
Why should banks allow that to continue?
In some of those families deaths had occurred to allow transfer of property.
In other families divorces had occurred.
Many of those retiring women were those who fulfilled the female and black requirements companies
sought in the seventies so they could seem diverse moved to upscale retirement apartments and condos. Why should those properties stay in that family? Why should greed not want those properties
back from the black community?
Then, since it had begun to work in many cases, why not spread the disease to other working
communities?
See, when a black woman in her fifties or sixties loses her home, society thinks that's par for the course. No one bothers to see any of it as a worrisome trend. Our society would take quite a while to
even start a study of what had begun to happen.
The black community is a bell weather for the nation because banks target blacks unchallenged.
When they perfect their poison products here, of course then they go for the best meat in our herds.
I think POTUS knows how dangerous this is for the country as a whole, and would like to discourage
it in real estate.
The Latino population in the U.S. is encouraged to buy fifty, sixty, seventy year old homes. They are
not as inclined to do so as black families. A black person feels more secure living outside the
ownership of any kind of white or majority- even as regards the geography of real estate.
But here in Detroit, churches often invest in building and renting, providing housing for their faithful.
Maybe that is the better model. Banks are still owners, but not quite so intimately, and not of huge
difficult to regulate properties.
Although I know black families will always prefer ownership, I think younger ones would be willing
to work and save a little longer if rental properties were 'clean, well-lit places', as Ernest Hemingway
might say. We in this city would surely never want to go back to slum landlords. New York can't be
much different.
The thing is, I don't believe the bank ensnared as many black family properties as they had hoped to
acquire. Which is so odd, because with everyone out of work, what could have been the plan for so
many foreclosed homes?
The crisis was fomented when banks moved their machinations to so very many mainstream
middle-class hoods all at once.
I guess that can happen again, right? If people begin to buy in large numbers we could see the banks
attempting to repeat this folly. They were so desperate, they foreclosed on people who didn't even
have defaulted mortgages! They foreclosed on people serving in Iraq.
So properties large and small were attacked.
Next stop, pensions.
Detroit's pensions are 90% funded. Since people worked for them, why allow them to be raided?
Easy question to answer.
Detroit city proper is considered a third world. In a great many parts of the city, Detroit is third world. Some neighborhoods have been depressed for nearly thirty years. They are not developing,
or underdeveloped. They have been and are continuously depressed areas...almost no commerce whatsoever.
When Detroit pensions are attacked, as the city has been, people in the country as a whole will say
'par for the course', what would anyone expect?
Bad idea people.
If the housing crisis put your property underwater, think about your pensions being underwater?
Detroit citizens are having their public schools decimated, though they have never turned down a tax
millage.
Lansing is destroying us as much as they can as best they can.
What good is my pension going to be if all my neighbors who were once city workers begin to starve?
When they get a few of us because we love coded racism so very, very much- they wind up getting
a bunch of us.
Pay attention to the city of 750,000 citizens who number only about 20,000 white.
I was forced to read Ernest Hemingway in college. So let's go back to him. 'Don't ask for whom the
bell tolls...'
Is Race A Mere Social Construct?
No. No it is not.
Unlike some Ph.D.s, I can many times, perceive race with at least one of my five biologic senses.
That means, for one thing, that it is often a phenotype.
Phenotypical realities are such helpful facts as we attempt to understand biology.
Race is evolutionarily inheritable.
Evolution is so biological.
Race is many things.
One of those things, is biology.
Unlike some Ph.D.s, I can many times, perceive race with at least one of my five biologic senses.
That means, for one thing, that it is often a phenotype.
Phenotypical realities are such helpful facts as we attempt to understand biology.
Race is evolutionarily inheritable.
Evolution is so biological.
Race is many things.
One of those things, is biology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)