Dangerous And Not A Bit Democratic

Both North Korea and Iran are insane administrations...that is, a danger to themselves and
others.
North Korea thinks South Korea has a far superior way of life for its people than the people of
North Korea can access because South Korea is a traitor. A traitor to starvation, and to escape
into CHINA?! Isn't that the role of any rational government in today's world? Shouldn't those
governing be an enemy to starvation, and to citizens operating as mindless drones? Apparently
in North Korea 'traitor' has a more esoteric definition. Or perhaps the definition is simply a more
autocratically disciplined one, put in the N. Korean dictionary by 'dear leader' himself.
In the case of Iran, they seem to have an odd response to a chance to become more prosperous.
They want to be destroyed. By enriching uranium, positioning launchers, Iran won't achieve much
peaceful power use. Iran will only be putting a giant red, and white target on its back. So senseless. If they get all this nuclear power, and one of their launchers moves even accidentally a micrometer to the left or right of where it should be, they will likely be digging out of rubble for years! Their leaders will scream, "No! Imperialists! That was an earthquake. Why have you
attacked?"
Useless...
As for the Obama administration cloaking a rep of reticence on Iran policies, that rep is a fiction.
This government does not in any way need another expensive destabilization in the Mid-East.
We pay to tear places down. We pay to build them back. Are we in need of spending trillions
more when all we have to do is play with real little wooden blocks for a very few dollars if we
still have our nursery tendencies?
President Obama has taken a series of steps toward the Ahmadinejad regime, which have been
necessary to build approach, in a much needed policy to keep world muscle flexing against this brute
instability. In a government where the judiciary, the clerics, the military, and the politicians
constantly attempt to undo one another to generate regional chaos, each branch of the government feels only might will generate stability. Therefore, these rulers are seeking an instability
in the Mid-east out President need only thwart.  We can shore up stable governments without always
waging war. That is our best defense against Iran, and it is also our best offense. Two birds ...
Why should our president position us to be the only world power to use force to stave off crisis in the Mid-east? Is American life and treasure that cheaply held? Not by Barack Obama, nor by Hilary Clinton for that matter...