B29

What a phony.
This juror knows so much about the letter of the law.  What does she know about justice?
She insulted Trayvon Martin's parents bt saying she is as hurt as the child's mother.
Next time, this lady who has laws read to her, and thinks God is supposed to do the job He gave
her to do-  maybe she will stand her ground.
Lots of luck to this woman whose real humanity is a muddle of instruction from the obviously
disingenuous. Who does she refer to when she says the law was read to her? The law was read to
the group as a whole.
The law only required malice of forethought, and killing.
When a grown man says there is something wrong with a kid he has never seen before, then stalks
the child with a gun after having called the child names two or three times in the space of a
moment, and then lies about why he got out of the car in the first place- what more malice could
have been shown a child in order for a thinking person to know that level of accosting is an aggression?
If this man aggressed this child, and then killed this child, the burdern of proof for murder is met.
Did she think John Guy wasn't the law when he explained so clearly to these jurors that the killer
was lying when the story he told would only hav been possible if Trayvon had had about ten arms?
Did she believe the detective was the law when he said he in no way believed Trayvon knocked this
creature to the ground with one blow?
This trial examined a lot of law.
She chose the ones she wanted to use for an acquittal. She didn't stand up for the truth.
Lots of luck to this cheshire cat, grinning.
Not!